I lost a tooth years ago and have been wearing a dental flipper. I’ve replaced the flipper a few times and now want something permanent. I wanted to get a dental implant but my dentist said that because I’ve lost so much bone in that area, I am not a candidate for dental implants. He wants me to get a dental bridge instead. Is that my best option? My other two teeth that would be used in the bridge are healthy and I don’t really want to grind them. Can you advise me?
Meredith
Dear Meredith,
While it is true that dental implants do require sufficient bone to retain them, not having that bone does not automatically disqualify you from getting a dental implant. It does mean that you will need an additional procedure before the implant will be possible. There is a bone grafting procedure that will build up the missing bone structure for you. After a time of healing, you should be able to move forward with the implant.
Both of these procedures require advanced post-doctoral training. It is possible that your dentist does not know how to place implants and, as a result, he is steering you toward something that he knows how to do— a dental bridge.
If you decide not to go through the extra bone grafting procedure, then a bridge is the next best permanently secure option. The other options currently available are all removable, which it sounds like you’re trying to avoid. There is a chance of getting a Maryland Bridge, but that would require cutting a notch into the adjacent teeth as well.
In your place, I would find a dentist who is skilled in placing dental implants and get the procedure you wanted to begin with.
This blog is brought to you by Hoffman Estates Dentist Dr. William Becker.
Click here to learn about the when a dental bridge would make more sense.